Yes. Rhode Island law does not require corroboration for a sex offense conviction. The testimony of one complainant, standing alone, is legally sufficient to sustain a charge and, if believed beyond a reasonable doubt, a conviction. That is the law, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest. What it means in practice is that the defense has to attack credibility rigorously, lock down timelines, surface inconsistencies, develop impeachment material, and build the alternative narrative the jury needs in order to have a reasonable doubt. Cases that rest entirely on one account with no outcry witness, no physical evidence, and significant inconsistencies are exactly the cases a seasoned Rhode Island sex crimes lawyer is built to defend. Silence and preparation win these trials; talking loses them.